[Python-Dev] Discussing the Great Library Reorganization
Giovanni Bajo
rasky at develer.com
Thu Mar 30 01:53:59 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Mar 30 01:53:59 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Discussing the Great Library Reorganization
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Discussing the Great Library Reorganization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote: > I don't have a problem with reorganising the standard library, but > what's the motivation for moving everything under a new root? Is it > just to allow people to unambigiously get hold of something from the > stdlib, rather than following the normal search path? Doesn't the > absolute/relative import PEP solve this problem? I don't think so. For instance, if I have a package called "db" in my application (which I import with absolute imports from other packages), I might have problems with the newly added "db.sqlite" package in Python 2.5. In fact, I guess my "db" will shadow the stdlib one, making it impossible to access. An unique prefix for stdlib would solve this. Giovanni Bajo
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Discussing the Great Library Reorganization
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Discussing the Great Library Reorganization
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list