[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri Mar 31 02:11:22 CEST 2006
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Mar 31 02:11:22 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fredrik Lundh wrote: > not according to the documentation (which says that the embedded library locks > the database file, to prevent other independent processes from accessing the data). I think that means other *non-Firebird* processes. Firebird itself uses a system of file locks and transactions to manage concurrent access by different Firebird applications. Just to make sure I wasn't imagining things, I ran two instances of a program of mine that uses Firebird, without server, accessing the same database, and both worked fine. They can independently access different parts of the database, and if they try to update the same part at the same time, deadlocks are reported as appropriate. On the whole I'm very impressed with Firebird. I've found it to be nothing less than sleek, efficient, powerful and reliable. I'd encourage anyone looking for a database, embedded or otherwise, to give it a go. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list