[Python-Dev] Declaring setters with getters
Duncan Booth
duncan.booth at suttoncourtenay.org.uk
Thu Nov 1 12:28:09 CET 2007
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Nov 1 12:28:09 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Explicit frame ref? (was Re: Declaring setters with getters)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Declaring setters with getters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Steven Bethard" <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote in news:d11dcfba0710311943u3f6fe4b1x12f1ee659ea51823 at mail.gmail.com: > On 10/31/07, Fred Drake <fdrake at acm.org> wrote: >> If I had to choose built-in names, though, I'd prefer "property", >> "propset", "propdel". Another possibility that seems reasonable >> (perhaps a bit better) would be: >> >> class Thing(object): >> >> @property >> def attribute(self): >> return 42 >> >> @property.set >> def attribute(self, value): >> self._ignored = value >> >> @property.delete >> def attribute(self): >> pass > > +1 on this spelling if possible. Though based on Guido's original > recipe it might have to be written as:: > > @property.set(attribute) > def attribute(self, value): > self._ignored = value > It *can* be written as Fred suggested: see http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/b442d08c9a019a8/8a381be5edc26340 However that depends on hacking the stack frames, so the implementation probably isn't appropriate here.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Explicit frame ref? (was Re: Declaring setters with getters)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Declaring setters with getters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list