[Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Nov 22 03:48:12 CET 2007
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Nov 22 03:48:12 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phillip J. Eby wrote: > The lookup sequence should probably be something like: > > 1. type(ob) is cls > 2. issubclass(type(ob), cls) But can't issubclass be overridden as well? -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiem! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list