[Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri Nov 23 07:57:07 CET 2007
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Nov 23 07:57:07 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phillip J. Eby wrote: > If you are configuring it per-class and > accessing it per-instance, and reusing an existing function, you have to > make it a staticmethod. I don't understand that. Can you provide an example? > > some subclasser later finds that he wants access to > > 'self'? > > Then he overrides it with a normal method. If that works, I don't see why making the default method a normal method wouldn't work also. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list