[Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
Christian Heimes
lists at cheimes.de
Sat Nov 24 09:51:47 CET 2007
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Nov 24 09:51:47 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Heimes wrote: > Without support from the descriptor it's not possible to distinguish a > function from an unbound method any more. I like to add im_class to the > function object. I don't see negative side effects, do you? OK, forget that. Pretend I've never said it. I shouldn't submit ideas until coffee shows its effect. Christian
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list