André Malo nd at perlig.de
Sat Nov 24 19:06:30 CET 2007

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

* Greg Ewing wrote:

> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > class MoneyField(Field):
> >     # does need staticmethod because two_decimal_places
> >     # doesn't take a self
> >     converter = staticmethod(two_decimal_places)
>
> Okay, I see what you mean now. But you could just as well wrap
> it in a function that takes self and discards it, 

I always thought, that this is exactly what staticmethod does.

> so I still 
> don't think staticmethod is essential in the absence of
> unbound methods.

Actually I don't see why those issues were bound together in the first 
place.

nd
-- 
Winnetous Erbe: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list