[Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3115
Thomas Wouters
thomas at python.org
Mon Feb 4 23:07:51 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Feb 4 23:07:51 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Initial attempt to PyCon sprint tutorial slides are up
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Any tips to tell sprinter at PyCon about developing on Windows?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Is anyone interested in seeing PEP 3115 (Metaclasses in Python 3000, ) backported to 2.6? Actually, I guess I am interested, so perhaps I should ask 'does anyone see any objection to it being backported'? Of course there should be full backward compatibility in 2.6, but I don't see any issue preventing that, right now. (I was actually working on backporting the new super() (incorrectly described in PEP 3135) which builds on top of PEP 3115; I can backport without PEP 3115 but it would be a waste if we then backported 3115 after all.) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20080204/9b134361/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Initial attempt to PyCon sprint tutorial slides are up
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Any tips to tell sprinter at PyCon about developing on Windows?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list