[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
Raymond Hettinger
python at rcn.com
Mon Feb 18 22:56:23 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Feb 18 22:56:23 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Steve Holden] > I appreciate the desire to "keep the issue tracker clean", but I think > human intelligence needs to be applied to the task, not just a > date-based cutoff. I concur. The older bug reports are ones that have survived past human-based clean-up efforts. They were left open as a reminder, as a todo, to await time or decision by a module author, or it wasn't clear how to solve valid report. IIRC, there are some for regexes that would take the time of the one or two people supporting that module and the request would cover a not urgently needed corner cases (like handling empty matches or speeding-up badly designed regexes). Those bug reports and rfes are valid and should be left open unless a module author decides that re's won't support the request. Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list