[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Thu Feb 21 22:21:50 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Feb 21 22:21:50 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Virgil Dupras <hsoft at hardcoded.net> wrote: > >> On 2/21/08, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > >> > - no selection - 118 > >> > wont fix 189 > >> > works for me 62 > >> > accepted 310 > >> > fixed 611 > >> > duplicate 75 > >> > later 17 > >> > invalid 73 > >> > postponed 6 > >> > out of date 193 > >> > remind 1 > >> > rejected 180 > >> > >> Thanks for running it. The rate is better than I expected, so I was > >> wrong in my assumption. > >> > >> What would be the difference between accepted and fixed for a closed ticket? > > > > I don't know what others do, but I use accepted for a patch submission > > and fixed for a bug report. > > > That sounds eminently sensible. So sensible there should be > documentation that tells us to do that. Drat it, where's Brett Cannon > when you need him? :-) Trying to get his sprint intro talk lined up for PyCon while dealing with the stdlib reorg. =) -Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list