[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Thu Feb 21 22:24:33 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Feb 21 22:24:33 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote: > 2008/2/21, Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org>: > > > > > That sounds eminently sensible. So sensible there should be > > > documentation that tells us to do that. Drat it, where's Brett Cannon > > > when you need him? :-) > > > > I'm always faced with a tiny quandry when closing a fixed bug that had a > > patch to fix it attached because both seem to apply. ;-) > > Yeap, and I'm sure I ave a % of wrongly marked issues when closing, :p. > > Anyway, if a patch, and a bug, and a RFE, etc, are all "issues", IMHO > is cluttering the fact that we have two or three denominations to > "this issue was ok and we executed the proper actions to close it". > > Everything in this aspect would be simpler if we have one word for > what I just meant. Something like "handle" or "resolved". An issue is an issue and we wanting a single way to say the issue was closed because what is was about was handled seems reasonable. -Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list