[Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk
Robert Brewer
fumanchu at aminus.org
Fri Feb 22 18:45:58 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Feb 22 18:45:58 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Raymond Hettinger wrote: > I thought the whole point of 3.0 was a recognition that all that > doubling-up was a bad thing and to be rid of it. Why make the > situation worse? ISTM that we need two versions of oct() like > we need a hole in the head. Heck, there's potentially a case to be > made that we don't need oct() at all. IIRC, unix permissions like > 0666 were the only use case that surfaced. Postgres bytea coercion is a frequent use case for oct() in my world. But I agree we don't need two versions. Robert Brewer fumanchu at aminus.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Backporting PEP 3127 to trunk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list