[Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Fri Feb 22 22:34:00 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Feb 22 22:34:00 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 1:28 PM, A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:06:05PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > > I think Martin is right that someone needs to take the lead and do a > > complete review of how issues are handled. That way we can do a change > > in one big batch to something that works better for Python. > > Are we, as a development community, really running into problems with > how we handle bugs? There are certainly small cleanups possible, such > as dropping the 'postponed' and 'later' resolutions that we don't seem > to use very much, but the flow seems reasonably efficient to me. > It's reasonable, but I wonder if it could be better. I am not sure as I have not had that much time to sit down and really think it through. I do know, though, that I like how Django has it structured: http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/contributing/#ticket-triage . -Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Small RFEs and the Bug Tracker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list