[Python-Dev] Getting a second review on a rewrite of test_logging
Brett Cannon
brett at python.org
Wed Feb 27 08:56:47 CET 2008
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Feb 27 08:56:47 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 2.6 and 3.0 ...and applink.c?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] hello
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think over a week ago I applied some GHOP work that turned test_logging into a doctest, but it turns out it is still flaky. Luckily Antoine Pitrou rewrote test_logging using unittest and seems to have made it more sound. But before I replace test_logging again (especially with a more dramatic change) I would like to get a second pair of eyes on the patch as I really don't know the logging package that well. It's issue 1740 (http://bugs.python.org/issue1740). If you happen to know the logging package I would really appreciate it if you could give the patch a look. -Brett
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python 2.6 and 3.0 ...and applink.c?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] hello
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list