[Python-Dev] standard library mimetypes module pathologically broken?
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 09:34:56 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 14 09:34:56 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] standard library mimetypes module pathologically broken?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] standard library mimetypes module pathologically broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Georg Brandl wrote: > Nick Coghlan schrieb: >> P.S. For anyone else that is slow like me, take a close look at PEP 387... > > What should we see, other than that we have two PEPs on the same topic that > should be merged? Benjamin wrote the second one, so he obviously knows there's a written deprecation policy in place, and hence his mini-rant probably wasn't meant to be taken literally - a point I completely missed on first reading. I agree the two PEPs should probably be consolidated into one, but absent a volunteer for that task, leaving them as is doesn't really hurt anything. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] standard library mimetypes module pathologically broken?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] standard library mimetypes module pathologically broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list