[Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 23:59:25 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Oct 2 23:59:25 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Next message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: > [Steven Bethard] >> Just saying "ok, switch your format strings >> from % to {}" didn't work in Python 3.0 for various good reasons, and >> I can't imagine it will work in Python 4.0 unless we have a transition >> plan. > > Do the users get any say in this? > I imagine that some people are heavily invested in %-formatting. > > Because there has been limited uptake on {}-formatting (afaict), > we still have limited experience with knowing that it is actually > better, less error-prone, easier to learn/rember, etc. Outside > a handful of people on this list, I have yet to see anyone adopt > it as the preferred syntax. Sure, I guess this is a possibility too, and it could make the transition process I have to work through for argparse much easier. ;-) To be clear, are you suggesting that APIs that currently support only %-formatting shouldn't bother supporting {}-formatting at all? Or are you suggesting that they should support both, but support for %-formatting should never go away? Steve -- Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you that? --- The Hiphopopotamus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Next message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list