[Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 15:20:28 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Oct 2 15:20:28 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Next message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/10/1 Eric Smith <eric at trueblade.com>: > It's tangential, but in the str.format case you don't want to check for just > '{asctime}', because you might want '{asctime:%Y-%m-%d}', for example. > > But there are ways to delay computing the time until you're sure it's > actually being used in the format string, without parsing the format string. > Now that I think of it, the same technique could be used with %-formatting: Still tangential, but it seems to me that this discussion has exposed a couple of areas where the logging interface is less than ideal: - The introspection of the format string to delay computing certain items (Eric's suggestion may be an improvement here). - The "call str() on any non-string object to get a format string" API (which precludes string subclasses). I suspect other APIs will exist with similar issues once the whole question of supporting multiple format syntaxes gets wider publicity... Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Next message: [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list