[Python-Dev] comments vs spam in PyPI [was: eggs now mandatory for pypi?]
Vinay Sajip
vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Oct 6 08:09:55 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Oct 6 08:09:55 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] comments vs spam in PyPI [was: eggs now mandatory for pypi?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] eggs now mandatory for pypi?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
P.J. Eby <pje <at> telecommunity.com> writes: > For example, having a packages reddit (nb: open source, written in > Python), where people can upvote or downvote packages and leave > comments. That's probably the minimum amount of checks and balances > required to avoid problems of the sort the PyPI commenting feature is > already having, since others will be able to reply to the comments, > and downvote nonsense into oblivion. Seems like a reasonable idea, given that there's already a Python reddit which seems popular. There was also www.cheeserater.com (which appears down at the moment) which was a Django demo site (source available at http://github.com/jacobian/cheeserater) for rating PyPI packages. I just created a "cheeseshop" sub-reddit to play around with. > (Alternatively, shutting off the comment system would also > work. Nothing stops people from using Google to search for "foo > sucks" or "problems using foo" if they want to research what's been > said about a package.) Yes, but it's good to have all the feedback in one place, if possible. Regards, Vinay Sajip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] comments vs spam in PyPI [was: eggs now mandatory for pypi?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] eggs now mandatory for pypi?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list