[Python-Dev] PEP about sys.implementation and implementation specific user site directory
Christian Heimes
lists at cheimes.de
Sat Oct 10 03:07:40 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 10 03:07:40 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP about sys.implementation and implementation specific user site directory
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP about sys.implementation and implementation specific user site directory
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benjamin Peterson wrote: > I think we should make a semi-private (public to the stdlib) module > like _sys or _implementation part of the Python VM API. Then, instead > of stuffing everything into sys, we can provide this information in > modules where it belongs. That's an interesting counter proposal. Your idea requires an additional import that I try to avoid. Looking at memory and performance, an additional module that is imported anyway isn't better. In my humble opinion the implementation information belongs into the sys module anyway. A new module just for the user site suffix seems unnecessary. Christian
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP about sys.implementation and implementation specific user site directory
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP about sys.implementation and implementation specific user site directory
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list