[Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
Eric Smith
eric at trueblade.com
Thu Oct 15 16:35:30 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 15 16:35:30 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
skip at pobox.com wrote: > Eric> I haven't tested it, but I still see WITHOUT_COMPLEX in trunk and py3k > Eric> branches. In py3k, it's referenced in: > ... > > Sure, but is it ever exercised? A name like WITHOUT_COMPLEX suggests that > it should be flipped on/off by configure using --without-complex, but that > script doesn't know about it and it's not mentioned in pyconfig.h.in, where > the various --with-* flags work their magic. Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were asking "does setting WITHOUT_COMPLEX work?" No idea about any configure option, sorry. Eric.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list