"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Oct 24 17:28:58 CEST 2009

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] First shot at some_set.get()
• Next message: [Python-Dev] First shot at some_set.get()
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

> I'm not being tongue-in-cheek or sarcastic. My question was serious -- 
> if there is a moratorium, is there any reason to bother submitting 
> patches for functional changes to built-ins? A lot can change between 
> now and 2013, and I for one wouldn't bother making a patch that I knew 
> wouldn't even be considered for inclusion for four years, and would 
> likely need to be re-done even if it was accepted. Guido has said that 
> the purpose of the moratorium is to discourage changes to the language. 

I haven't been following the discussion, but I wouldn't expect that
a moratorium on language changes would rule out adding a method to the
set type.

Regards,
Martin

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] First shot at some_set.get()
• Next message: [Python-Dev] First shot at some_set.get()
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list