[Python-Dev] One obvious way to do interning [Was: Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it]
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 22:50:56 CET 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 26 22:50:56 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] One obvious way to do interning [Was: Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Set methods for mapping views
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote: > Alexander Belopolsky wrote: >> Terry Reedy wrote: >>> I had exactly the same idea, but did not post because it violates the >>> general rule that mutators return None. >> >> Is there such a rule? What about set/dict pop? > > The rule perhaps should be restated as 'Collection mutators return None > or possible an item but not the collection.' And to clarify the rationale for that guideline: it is to make it clear that the mutator is changing the container in place and *not* creating a new container object. myset.pop() # No new container, returns popped object mylist.sort() # No new container, returns None sorted(mylist) # New container, so return it mystr.lower() # Creates new string, so return it Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] One obvious way to do interning [Was: Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Set methods for mapping views
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list