[Python-Dev] why different between staticmethod and classmethod on non-callable object?
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Sep 2 00:28:06 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 2 00:28:06 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] why different between staticmethod and classmethod on non-callable object?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] why different between staticmethod and classmethod on non-callable object?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brett Cannon wrote: > It isn't like it is checking > explicitly for a function or method, just that it can be called which > seems reasonable to me (unless PyCallable_Check() is as off as > callable() was). I think it just checks that there's something in the tp_call slot, which is reasonable -- if it's empty, there's no way that calling the object could ever succeed, so you might as well fail early. -- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] why different between staticmethod and classmethod on non-callable object?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] why different between staticmethod and classmethod on non-callable object?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list