[Python-Dev] default of returning None hurts performance?
Kristján Valur Jónsson
kristjan at ccpgames.com
Wed Sep 2 14:07:19 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 2 14:07:19 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] default of returning None hurts performance?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] default of returning None hurts performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Not advocating a change, merely pointing out that it's how Ruby works. K > -----Original Message----- > From: python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org > [mailto:python-dev-bounces+kristjan=ccpgames.com at python.org] On Behalf > Of Nick Coghlan > Sent: 2. september 2009 11:12 > To: Greg Ewing > Cc: python-dev at python.org > Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] default of returning None hurts performance? > It also means adding a debugging message, assertion, or otherwise > side-effect free statement can change the return value of the function. > Not cool. >
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] default of returning None hurts performance?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] default of returning None hurts performance?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list