[Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 3144 review.
R. David Murray
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Thu Sep 17 17:23:19 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 17 17:23:19 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 at 15:44, DrKJam wrote: > Granted, there are decisions to be made about exactly what the > properties/methods should be named to avoid ambiguity, but they are > important enough to be given access to in their own right. Details in > docstrings help too ;-) 'network' and 'broadcast' are very much the > convention used pretty much everywhere (including libraries found in other > languages such as Ruby and Perl). Interesting. Out of curiosity I searched for 'perl ip address' and found Net::IP (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-IP/IP.pm). This package appears to use the same object class for both addresses and networks. It has neither a 'network' nor a 'broadcast' attribute; instead it has 'ip' (it isn't clear from the docs if that returns the network address or the IP that was passed in to the constructor) and 'last_ip'. --David
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list