[Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
Jake McGuire
mcguire at google.com
Thu Sep 17 20:58:29 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 17 20:58:29 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday, September 17, 2009, Daniel Fetchinson <fetchinson at googlemail.com> wrote: >>>>>> 188 (check that, 190) people have downloaded the 2.0 release in the >>>>>> last week (numbers publicly available from the http://code.google.com). I >>>>>> can't tell you how many (if any) have downloaded it via svn. >>>>> >>>>> Downloading and using are not the same thing. >>>> >>>> Correct, but there is a strong positive correlation between the two. >>>> If you have a better method for determining what you would consider an >>>> appropriate level of usage, I'm all ears. >>> >>> A good way of determining the level of usage would be pointing to open >>> source projects that are popular in the python community and which >>> incorporate your module. >> >> well, the 2.0 release is still new. http://codesearch.google.com shows some >> projects using the 1.x release; hopefully some of those 200 >> downloaders will put up some publicly indexable python code at some >> point. > > I think one first needs to wait until this happens, I meana large user > base is formed, before a meaningful discussion can be done on whether > to include it in the stdlib or not. The long and largely academic > thread here I think illustrates this point. Without a large user base > it's up to anybody's gut feelings what is 'right' and what 'feels > wrong'. +1000 -jake
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list