[Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
Andrew McNamara
andrewm at object-craft.com.au
Fri Sep 18 02:49:49 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Sep 18 02:49:49 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:41:37 am Andrew McNamara wrote: >> In the olden days, the mask was spelled out in octets (eg >> 255.255.255.0). But we've moved to a more compact and logical >> notation where the number of leading significant bits is specified >> (eg /24). > >I hope you're not suggesting the older notation be unsupported? I would >expect to be able to use a mask like 255.255.255.192 without having to >count bits myself. No, of course not - I was just explaining the relationship between the two notations for people who may not have been aware. -- Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft http://www.object-craft.com.au/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list