[Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
Tarek Ziadé
ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Tue Sep 22 20:12:24 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Sep 22 20:12:24 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/9/22 P.J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com>: > At 03:21 PM 9/22/2009 +0200, Tarek Ziadé wrote: >> >> Hello Here's a wrapup of the Distutils-SIG discussion we had on the >> "static metadata" topic. I realize that it's a good thing to send in. >> python-dev such wrapup on distutils design decisions, to keep everyone >> informed and get more feedback when required > > The above implies that a consensus was reached on this topic; you should > perhaps at least note that in this case it actually means that you just > terminated the discussion and pronounced your choice, just as a simpler > solution for dynamic dependencies (proposed by Sridhar) was beginning to > gain some support. I pronounced my choice on the syntax of the conditions in the setup.cfg file, and the setuptools-like syntax to express them Sridhar presented looked more complex. If you are talking about another solution than using setup.cfg with conditional expressions, please start a new thread that demonstrates how it will work, we all want the best solution of course. Tarek
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list