[Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridharr at activestate.com
Wed Sep 23 00:53:46 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 23 00:53:46 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:48:08 -0700, Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk> wrote: > > Since the language summit at PyCon 2009 various committers, including > me, have been encouraging Tarek to act as distutils dictator to get > things finished as we all know people are prone to bikeshedding that > would kill any forward momentum we have towards improving the > packaging situation. > ...except that this isn't bikeshedding. Use of that term just to stifle > productive discussion is also rude. As I see it, the choice of syntax *as such* is an issue of bikeshedding except that the choice of one syntax over the another could make it supportive to add an useful feature in setuptools to distutils. For instance, this syntax which I proposed - http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2009-September/013289.html - will make us think about adding install_requires/extra_requires to distutils *in addition to* the conditional metadata .. rather than inventing a new syntax to support only conditional metadata. -srid
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list