[Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
Chris Withers
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Wed Sep 23 10:12:21 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 23 10:12:21 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Next message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Dickinson wrote: > I (still :-) think this is covered, for Python 2.x at least, by: > > http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#coercion-rules But this isn't coercion! :-) > - For objects x and y, first x.__op__(y) is tried. If this is not > implemented or returns NotImplemented, y.__rop__(x) is tried. Also, the above is not so: Python 2.5.1 >>> class X: ... def __eq__(self,other): ... print "X __eq__" >>> class Z: pass ... >>> Z()==X() X __eq__ No __req__ in sight... cheers, Chris -- Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Next message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list