[Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
Mark Dickinson
dickinsm at gmail.com
Wed Sep 23 18:34:37 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 23 18:34:37 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Next message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Dino Viehland <dinov at microsoft.com> wrote: > We are going to start contributing tests back real soon now. I'm not sure > that these are the best tests to contribute as they require a version of > Python to compare against rather than being nice and stand alone. But I'm > sure we have other tests which cover this as well just not as exhaustively. > We could also possibly check in the baseline file and then CPython could > compare it's self to previous versions but it'd probably be a pretty > big file - so it probably shouldn't be included in the standard install > in the tests directory. How big is big? For comparison, CPython's Lib/test/decimaltestdata directory alone is already over 4Mb, so maybe size isn't an issue? Mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Next message: [Python-Dev] operator precedence of __eq__, __ne__, etc, if both object have implementations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list