[Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 04:16:01 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Sep 24 04:16:01 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Antoine Pitrou wrote: > As far as I'm concerned, anything which looks intuitive enough (e.g. ini-style) > and not overly complicated is fine. The details of the syntax aren't really > important as long as they make sense, and don't get in the way. One small comment before all this goes back to the distutils list: the abbreviation "py" shouldn't be used to refer to the Python interpreter as it is somewhat ambiguous due to the existence of the independent "py" package [1]. The longer "python_version" has a genuine advantage in clarity here. Cheers, Nick. [1] http://codespeak.net/py/dist/index.html -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Distutils ML wrap-up: setup.cfg new format
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list