[Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 04:55:46 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Sep 28 04:55:46 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > I am neutral on the idea of adding argparse. However, I'm -1 on deprecating > optparse. It is very widely used (tons of scripts use it), and ok for many uses; > deprecating it is totally unhelpful and gratuitous. Could you elaborate? If you are worried about Python 2.X scripts, note from the PEP that the only things that will ever show up in Python 2.X are: PendingDeprecation warnings, which by default are not displayed, and documentation notes directing users of getopt and optparse to argparse. I think these messages are useful for folks using 2.X who some day would like to migrate to 3.X, and at the same time should have zero effect on existing scripts. If you think getopt and optparse should stick around in 3.X, why is that? If you think there are things that getopt and optparse do better than argparse, could you please give some examples? Steve -- Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you that? --- The Hiphopopotamus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list