[Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 13:58:22 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Sep 28 13:58:22 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Moody wrote: >> Assuming the Network type loses the notion of a specific host (or host address, >> or `ip`) attached to it, yes. > > this is "less useful (strictly removing functionality)" and is an > example of what I explicitly said I was not going to do with ipaddr. A possible compromise then: Just change the definition of network equality to only consider the network address and ignore the ip attribute. Optionally provide a separate comparison method that pays attention to the ip attribute (keeping in mind that it isn't particularly hard for people to write out "net1 == net2 and net1.ip == net2.ip" if they care about the extra state). Then "IPNetwork" can be largely documented as a true IP network definition, with the "Host with Netmask" use case handled by having an IPNetwork object with "net.ip != net.network". Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 3144 review.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list