[Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Wed Sep 30 03:26:04 CEST 2009
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Sep 30 03:26:04 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Keeping getopt around *and* including a "add_getopt_arguments" method in > argparse is probably the best of both worlds, in that it allows for > relatively straightforward evolution of an application: > > 1. Start with getopt > 2. As the getopt argument parsing gets twisty and arcane and maintaining > the help string becomes a nightmare, move to argparse with the > "add_getopt_arguments" method. > 3. Over time, convert more arguments to proper argparse arguments with > full documentation. One thing that wouldn't be good in this transition is that "add_getopt_arguments" can only generate the part of the help string that says "-a" and "--author" exist as options -- it can't add the additional bit of text that says what they do because that's not provided to the getopt API. I suspect this makes the transition less convenient because with getopt you were probably already manually maintaining a usage message that had at least some of this information, and switching to "add_getopt_arguments" would mean throwing this information away. Steve -- Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis? Did Steve tell you that? --- The Hiphopopotamus
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 389: argparse - new command line parsing module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list