[Python-Dev] Very Strange Argument Handling Behavior
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sat Apr 17 04:47:05 CEST 2010
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Apr 17 04:47:05 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Very Strange Argument Handling Behavior
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Very Strange Argument Handling Behavior
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Raymond Hettinger >> <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Guido van Rossum, 16.04.2010 16:33: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am fine with >>>>>> declaring dict({}, **{1:3}) illegal, since after all it is abuse of >>>>>> the ** mechanism. >>> >>> ISTM that making it illegal costs cycles with giving any real benefit. >> >> Diasagree. The real benefit is better cross-implementation portability. > > Would hate for 100% of users will pay a performance penalty > when most applications aren't abusing keyword dictionaries > so they already work cross-platfrom. > > Isn't there anyway to make this a one-time check instead > of a PyLint style validation check running on every invocation > of a function or method using **kwds? > > Or perhaps there can be a switch or flag to enable developers to > check for non-standard uses of **kwds. That way, they can clean-up > their programs but not make the end users pay for the checks every time > they run an application that has already been cleaned-up. Please stop worrying. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Very Strange Argument Handling Behavior
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Very Strange Argument Handling Behavior
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list