[Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
Dirkjan Ochtman
dirkjan at ochtman.nl
Wed Apr 28 09:22:01 CEST 2010
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Apr 28 09:22:01 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 23:55, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe the more important part of Barry's suggested change here is > requiring a link to the archived message (usually from python-dev) where > the PEP was accepted (be it directly by you as BDFL, or by consensus > from a "sufficient" number of core developers). This will likely also > help with reminding people to announce on python-dev when PEPs are > accepted by consensus (or by you) somewhere like PyCon or a sprint. Though maybe it should be called Conclusion instead of Accepted and used for Rejected PEPs, as well? Cheers, Dirkjan
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list