[Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Apr 30 21:51:42 CEST 2010
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Apr 30 21:51:42 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> As to Guido's point about the decision making process, Nick's right. I just > want to make sure we can capture the resolution in the PEP, be it by BDFL > pronouncement or "hey, silence is acceptance" email. I don't think "silence is acceptance" will work out in practice. For issues where a PEP was written in the first place, somebody will *always* object, and forever so, hoping that what he considers a mistake will not be done. The advantage of Guido acting as BDFL was that somebody would make an decision ultimately, one which both proponents and opponents of the PEP would accept. Without a BDFL, I think we need a committee to make decisions, e.g. by majority vote amongst committers. Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Two small PEP ideas
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list