[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
Paul Moore
p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sun Mar 6 15:55:24 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Mar 6 15:55:24 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6 March 2011 02:33, Mark Hammond <skippy.hammond at gmail.com> wrote: > IIUC, the PEP language is referring to links which point to a specific > version of Python and that there is no suggestion a 'python3' will live in > the Python 3 binary tree. If that is correct and assuming we don't want to > investigate using links on Windows, I'd suggest the best analogy to the *nix > situation could be simply for the installers to generate "python2.bat" and > "python3.bat" files and put them in System32 with a "last installed wins" > policy. No, no, no! Please no! Bat files are a lousy way of writing wrappers on Windows, as they don't nest. I've lost count of the number of times I've been tripped up by putting a series of commands into a batch file, only to have them fail because somewhere in the middle is a bat file wrapper which makes the "outer" bat file stop part way through :-( </rant> Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list