[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
Mark Hammond
skippy.hammond at gmail.com
Mon Mar 7 02:26:36 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Mar 7 02:26:36 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/03/2011 10:04 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > Paul Moore was +1 on Windows being included. Mark did accept that some > of the changes were "desirable", but was also concerned they didn't > address all the issues on Windows. I *would* like to see all the issues > addressed but I think that is outside the scope of this PEP. I simply think Windows is outside the scope of this PEP - the title is "The "python" command on Unix-Like Systems" - IMO it should be kept short and focus on exactly what the title says. ... > A generic Python launcher that could be used for the file association > and honours the Unix style shebang line, delegating to the appropriate > version of python, is an interesting idea but out of the scope of this PEP. As above - I think Windows should be kept out of scope. > It would be interesting to see if Mark, or others, are strongly opposed > to these ideas or have strong preferences. If the biggest downside is > really that it still leaves some issues unresolved then lets do this and > tackle the other issues separately. As mentioned in my other email, I'm -0 as I think they are slightly misguided. Why not leave the PEP with "Unix-like" in the title to Unix-like systems and create one with Windows in the title for Windows? :) Cheers, Mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list