[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
Mark Hammond
mhammond at skippinet.com.au
Mon Mar 7 11:49:24 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Mar 7 11:49:24 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/03/2011 9:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > That sounds like a fairly cool idea. So if I follow what you're > suggesting, we'd have a single python.exe, probably installed in > system32, which did the necessary command line juggling and shebang > parsing, then simply redirected to the appropriate Python interpreter? > Presumably that launcher would be pretty version independent, so (a) > the one that gets installed with Python 3.3 would support older > versions even though they didn't include the launcher themselves, (b) > overwriting the launcher when a new version of Python is installed > wouldn't be too big a deal, and (c) it could be released as a > standalone package for people with only older versions of Python > installed? Yup - although I think a pythonw.exe launcher would be needed too (for the same reasons we need python.exe and pythonw.exe today) > I like this idea. If I had the spare time (I don't :-() I'd work on this myself. > > +1 from me. Cool - I may have a go at this over the next few weekends... :) Cheers, Mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list