[Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
Mark Hammond
skippy.hammond at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 01:10:05 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 8 01:10:05 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/03/2011 10:15 AM, Greg Ewing wrote: > Mark Hammond wrote: > >> Yup - although I think a pythonw.exe launcher would be needed too > > Couldn't the launcher look at the extension of the file being > launched to decide about this? Nope - the launcher itself must be marked as "console" or "windows", and hence would suffer the exact same problem which needs us to have python.exe and pythonw.exe in the first place (ie, in some cases you get a "temp" console where you don't want one, and in other cases you get a new console where you wanted an existing one to be used) Mark
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [PEPs] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list