[Python-Dev] forward-porting from 3.1 to 3.2 to 3.3
Nadeem Vawda
nadeem.vawda at gmail.com
Sat Mar 12 09:10:05 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Mar 12 09:10:05 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] forward-porting from 3.1 to 3.2 to 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] forward-porting from 3.1 to 3.2 to 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote: > The devguide's recommendation is to "forward-port" changes withing a major > release line, i.e. if I need something in all 3.[123], then start with 3.1 > and forward-port (by "hg merge <branch>") to 3.2 and then 3.3 > > Just to clarify - does this mean that all changesets that are applied to 3.2 > eventually get to 3.3 as well? Since we just do "hg merge 3.2" in the 3.3 > clone, I guess this must be true. But then what happens if there's a change > in 3.2 that shouldn't get into 3.3? (say a bug fix for a feature that has > disappeared)? The "Note:" box two paragraphs down from <http://docs.python.org/devguide/committing.html#porting-within-a-major-version> explains how prevent a changeset from propagating: you do a dummy merge where you revert the changes before committing. This marks the changeset from 3.2 as having been merged into default/3.3 without actually applying the changes. Nadeem
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] forward-porting from 3.1 to 3.2 to 3.3
- Next message: [Python-Dev] forward-porting from 3.1 to 3.2 to 3.3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list