[Python-Dev] Python3 regret about deleting list.sort(cmp=...)
Reid Kleckner
reid.kleckner at gmail.com
Sat Mar 12 23:09:29 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Mar 12 23:09:29 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python3 regret about deleting list.sort(cmp=...)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python3 regret about deleting list.sort(cmp=...)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Reid Kleckner <reid.kleckner at gmail.com> wrote: >> They should be able to use a slotted cmp_to_key style class: >> http://docs.python.org/howto/sorting.html >> >> That will allocate 1 Python object with no dict per key, but that >> might not be good enough. > > Tuples are already slotted, so that isn't likely to help in this case. It's three allocations vs. one. The first is tuple + str + int, while the adapter is just one object. I'm not sure how it eventually shakes out, though. That said, it's still worse than Python 2, which is zero allocations. :) Reid
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python3 regret about deleting list.sort(cmp=...)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python3 regret about deleting list.sort(cmp=...)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list