[Python-Dev] pydoc for named tuples is missing methods
James Mills
prologic at shortcircuit.net.au
Tue Mar 15 03:02:30 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 15 03:02:30 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pydoc for named tuples is missing methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pydoc for named tuples is missing methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: >> How would that work if you had a field named "replace"? I think >> Raymond's current design is as good as it's going to get. > > 'as_dict' is an unlikely fieldname. 're_place' is too, but that just shift > the '_' from '_replace'. No gain. I might prefer _asdict to _as_dict, but > not enough to change. Probably a stupid idea (sorry) but one could just make asdict() and replace() public methods with the caveat that developers not use those as field names. cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- "Problems are solved by method"
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pydoc for named tuples is missing methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pydoc for named tuples is missing methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list