[Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
Eugene Toder
eltoder at gmail.com
Tue Mar 15 05:56:55 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Mar 15 05:56:55 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To give this a positive spin, here's a patch that implements constant folding on AST (it does few other optimizations on compiler data structures, so it replaces "peephole over bytecode" completely). http://bugs.python.org/issue11549 It passes make test, but of course more testing is needed. Comments are welcome. Eugene
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggest reverting today's checkin (recursive constant folding in the peephole optimizer)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list