[Python-Dev] User conversions in custom string.Formatter
Andrew Svetlov
andrew.svetlov at gmail.com
Wed Mar 16 01:07:27 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 16 01:07:27 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Finally switch urllib.parse to RFC3986 semantics?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] User conversions in custom string.Formatter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As PEP 3101 http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3101/ says (and current Python does) user can specify conversions like "{0!s}". In custom formatters (derived from string.Formatter) he can override convert_field method to add custom conversions. I experimented with that last month and found it very convenient. >From my perspective custom conversions are very close to 'filters' from html template engines (jinja2, mako, django etc). While I like to see custom conversions simple and easy I don't wan't to bring 'cascading' and 'parametrization' to standard formatting. But why don't relax spec a bit and allow to use any word (with 'identifier' semantix, I mean str.isidentifier()) as conversion name? Proposed update doesn't make any backward incompatibility (both python and public C API are not changed), it's clean and obvious. And it's very funny to use words instead single characters for custom user-specific conversions. What do you think?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Finally switch urllib.parse to RFC3986 semantics?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] User conversions in custom string.Formatter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list