[Python-Dev] public visibility of python-dev decisions "before it's too late"
Eric Smith
eric at trueblade.com
Wed Mar 16 04:12:52 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Mar 16 04:12:52 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] public visibility of python-dev decisions "before it's too late"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] public visibility of python-dev decisions "before it's too late"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/15/2011 10:58 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 22:42, Guido van Rossum<guido at python.org> wrote: >> Fortunately there may not be any more such cases since no new major >> versions of Python 2 will be released. So I'm not sure what an update >> of PEP 5 will buy us. > > That is a good point. But at least making sure no more API's get > deprecated in 3.3 (and preferably 3.4) would go a long way, as we are > likely to still have to support Python 2 in parallell for those > versions as well. I think it's valid that we should consider the affect of libraries that are trying to support 2.x and 3.y (for some values of x and y) at the same time. Speaking for myself, I'll admit I hadn't thought of this during any discussions of changing APIs. We'll only have to consider this for at most 2 more 3.x releases, if we believe the 5 year timeframe (since 3.0) for most projects to migrate. But I agree that there's not much we can do in the capsule case. The ship has sailed on that one. Eric.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] public visibility of python-dev decisions "before it's too late"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] public visibility of python-dev decisions "before it's too late"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list