[Python-Dev] VM and Language summit info for those not at Pycon (and those that are!)
Antoine Pitrou
solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun Mar 20 12:40:49 CET 2011
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Mar 20 12:40:49 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] VM and Language summit info for those not at Pycon (and those that are!)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] VM and Language summit info for those not at Pycon (and those that are!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:32:34 -0400 Jesse Noller <jnoller at gmail.com> wrote: > > The reason why there was no mention is probably because no one > intimately familiar with Cython was there, and if they were - it was > not brought up. If Cython supports PyPy - and Jython, and IronPython, > your proposal makes sense. The reason for "pure" python implementation > is so that other implementations can share the exact same standard > library we have today. Well, realistically, they don't. Some functionality just isn't satisfied with a slow Python implementation. The io module is a primary example of that. (but I don't think a Cython version of io would be fast enough, either) Regards Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] VM and Language summit info for those not at Pycon (and those that are!)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] VM and Language summit info for those not at Pycon (and those that are!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list