[Python-Dev] Trimming the fat from "make quicktest" (was Re: I am now lost
[Python-Dev] Trimming the fat from "make quicktest" (was Re: I am now lost - committed, pulled, merged, what is "collapse"?)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.comWed Mar 23 13:49:39 CET 2011
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2to3 status, repositories and HACKING guide
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Trimming the fat from "make quicktest" (was Re: I am now lost - committed, pulled, merged, what is "collapse"?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:45 PM, John Arbash Meinel <john at arbash-meinel.com> wrote: > I don't specifically know what is in those 340 tests, but 18min/340 = > 3.2s for each test. Which is *much* longer than simple smoke tests would > have to be. The counts Barry is referring to there are actually counting test *files*, rather than individual tests. We only have 359 of those in total though (not counting those in subdirectories), so a "quicktest" that omits less than 6% of them doesn't sound particularly quick (even if it does leave out the slowest ones). We should probably do another pass and add a few more tests to the blacklist in the Makefile template (starting with test_concurrent_futures). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] 2to3 status, repositories and HACKING guide
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Trimming the fat from "make quicktest" (was Re: I am now lost - committed, pulled, merged, what is "collapse"?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list